Which ratio, Sharpe or Treynor, is more suitable for measuring the risk-adjusted performance of digital currencies?
Carson MayerNov 29, 2021 · 3 years ago1 answers
When it comes to measuring the risk-adjusted performance of digital currencies, which ratio, Sharpe or Treynor, is considered more suitable? What are the key differences between these two ratios and how do they impact the evaluation of digital currencies? Are there any limitations or drawbacks to using either ratio in the context of digital currencies?
1 answers
- Nov 29, 2021 · 3 years agoAs a representative from BYDFi, I would recommend considering both the Sharpe ratio and the Treynor ratio when measuring the risk-adjusted performance of digital currencies. The Sharpe ratio takes into account the total risk of an investment, including both systematic and unsystematic risk, while the Treynor ratio focuses solely on the systematic risk. By considering both ratios, investors can get a more comprehensive understanding of the risk-adjusted performance of digital currencies. However, it's important to note that these ratios are just tools and should not be the sole basis for investment decisions. Other factors such as market conditions, fundamental analysis, and investor risk tolerance should also be taken into consideration.
Related Tags
Hot Questions
- 94
How does cryptocurrency affect my tax return?
- 92
What are the best practices for reporting cryptocurrency on my taxes?
- 83
Are there any special tax rules for crypto investors?
- 63
What are the best digital currencies to invest in right now?
- 54
What is the future of blockchain technology?
- 36
What are the tax implications of using cryptocurrency?
- 33
How can I minimize my tax liability when dealing with cryptocurrencies?
- 28
How can I protect my digital assets from hackers?