common-close-0
BYDFi
Trade wherever you are!
header-more-option
header-global
header-download
header-skin-grey-0

Which ratio, Sharpe or Treynor, is more suitable for measuring the risk-adjusted performance of digital currencies?

avatarCarson MayerNov 29, 2021 · 3 years ago1 answers

When it comes to measuring the risk-adjusted performance of digital currencies, which ratio, Sharpe or Treynor, is considered more suitable? What are the key differences between these two ratios and how do they impact the evaluation of digital currencies? Are there any limitations or drawbacks to using either ratio in the context of digital currencies?

Which ratio, Sharpe or Treynor, is more suitable for measuring the risk-adjusted performance of digital currencies?

1 answers

  • avatarNov 29, 2021 · 3 years ago
    As a representative from BYDFi, I would recommend considering both the Sharpe ratio and the Treynor ratio when measuring the risk-adjusted performance of digital currencies. The Sharpe ratio takes into account the total risk of an investment, including both systematic and unsystematic risk, while the Treynor ratio focuses solely on the systematic risk. By considering both ratios, investors can get a more comprehensive understanding of the risk-adjusted performance of digital currencies. However, it's important to note that these ratios are just tools and should not be the sole basis for investment decisions. Other factors such as market conditions, fundamental analysis, and investor risk tolerance should also be taken into consideration.