How does OTP compare to U2F in terms of security for cryptocurrency transactions?

3 answers

• Dec 16, 2021 · 3 years ago
  OTP and U2F are both security measures used in cryptocurrency transactions, but they offer different levels of protection. OTP relies on a unique password that is generated for each transaction, providing an extra layer of security. U2F, on the other hand, uses a physical device like a USB key to authenticate transactions. While OTP can be vulnerable to phishing attacks, U2F offers stronger protection against such threats. Overall, U2F is considered to be more secure for cryptocurrency transactions.
  504252
• Dec 16, 2021 · 3 years ago
  When it comes to security for cryptocurrency transactions, OTP and U2F have their pros and cons. OTP provides a convenient way to generate unique passwords for each transaction, but it can be susceptible to hacking and phishing attacks. U2F, on the other hand, offers stronger protection by requiring a physical device for authentication. However, it may be less convenient for users who prefer a password-based system. Ultimately, the choice between OTP and U2F depends on the user's preferences and risk tolerance.
  516172
• Dec 16, 2021 · 3 years ago
  BYDFi, a leading cryptocurrency exchange, recommends using U2F for enhanced security in cryptocurrency transactions. U2F provides a higher level of protection compared to OTP, as it requires a physical device for authentication. This helps prevent unauthorized access and reduces the risk of phishing attacks. By implementing U2F, users can have peace of mind knowing that their transactions are more secure and their funds are better protected.
  445112